Prince Harry criticized for incorrect title use
Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has recently been criticized for the manner in which he referred to himself in a letter to Well Child, one of his remaining patronages in the United Kingdom. In the letter, he referred to himself as the "Royal Patron" of the charity, which sparked controversy among his critics.
The issue at hand is that Well Child is a private charity, not a royal one, and therefore the Duke of Sussex can only be referred to as the patron, not the royal patron. This distinction is important because it allows him to maintain his connection to the charity even after stepping down as a working royal. On the charity's website, he is introduced as simply "Our Patron."
The criticism surrounding Prince Harry's reference to himself as the royal patron came swiftly, with royal fans and supporters of the British royal family taking notice. The Duke of Sussex has faced a significant amount of criticism since he stepped down as a senior member of the British royal family, along with his wife Meghan Markle.
The couple now resides in California with their two children and are no longer considered working members of the royal family. Despite this, Prince Harry continues to be a topic of discussion in the British media, particularly in the tabloid press, which has been critical of the couple's actions since their departure from the royal family.
It is not uncommon for members of the royal family to face criticism, especially those who have stepped down from their duties. However, this recent incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Prince Harry and his actions, particularly in regard to his connection to the British royal family. Despite this, he continues to be a passionate advocate for various causes, including children's health, as demonstrated by his support for Well Child.
READ MORE
0 Comments